Asset allocation on retirement - some thoughts as the naughties begin
"[T]hose of us who lived with the market during the 1966-1982 period can attest that there have
been long stretches when equities returned only the dividend; there were no capital gains." A
recurrence of such a period of flatness "would wreak havoc with the retirement plans of many
Baby Boomers, who have become accustomed to annual double-digit percentage returns on their
equities," says Walter Weil writing in the December 27, 1999 issue of Barron's. Weil, a retired
hedge-fund manager, thinks such a flat stretch is probable and that "a rethinking of asset
allocations in retirement funds would be appropriate" for Boomers who own index funds or
low-yield stocks.
Why will a flat market mess up the retirement plans of most Boomers? Mutual funds are not noted
for providing income, and dividend yields on most common stocks are very low. Boomers could
not survive on the income provided by their funds. Most Boomers would be forced to sell their
funds and switch to assets with a higher yield. Most would turn to bonds: it's conventional
wisdom.
What's going to happen when Boomers start selling their no-yield or low yield stocks, when the tidal wave of Boomers money going into mutual funds reverses? Faced with massive redemptions, mutual fund managers will be forced to sell: share prices will be pushed down.
"The timing is hard to predict," Walter Weis says. "Though a Boomer born in 1946 reaches 60 in
2006, it's uncertain he will retire then and if so, when he will start to alter the asset mix of his
retirement funds to prepare for this life change. Furthermore, though there will be equity
purchasers to provide the other side of the transaction, I doubt that there will be more urgent
buyers than urgent sellers - mutual fund managers faced with Boomers' redemptions.
Whenever a forecast of an event is highly probable, the stock market discounts it well in advance.
The arrival of Baby Boomers' retirement age is one such event. Suffice it to say that the one factor
that arguably has provided the most significant tail wind behind our current prosperity will become
a stiff headwind, perhaps sooner than expected."
What kind of return (yield + capital gain) will we be looking at when the indexes revert to the norm? If this regression to the norm comes by year-end 2004, Weis estimates the annual compound rate of return of the S&P 500 index at -3.3%. If it's before year-end 2009, it's 2.5% annually, if regression is before 2014, the return is 4.4%.
The yield we are obtaining right now on our common stocks is higher than returns the Walter
Weis is expecting from the stock market. And our yield does not count the dividend growth we
will get in the future. Our plan is working. Furthermore, when (not if...it's only a question of time)
Boomers start selling their funds and low-yield stocks, I expect those of us who subscribe to the
buy and hold for the dividend growth theory will benefit in two ways:
1. Faced with low or negative capital gains, Boomers, many of whom will be in charge of
corporations, will influence and pressure corporations to increase dividends. As John Neff says,
"the quest for yield" will return.
2. Some Boomers will switch to higher yield stocks instead of bonds, causing the prices of the
type of stocks we hold to rise.
For information about Barron's On line, go to http://interactive.wsj.com